Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  394 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 394 476 Next Page
Page Background

persistence were statistically significantly greater with

mirabegron than with tolterodine ER in all patients, as well

as in all three predefined subcohorts (

p

<

0.0001 all compar-

isons;

Supplementary Table 3

). Mean MPR was significantly

higher with mirabegron than with tolterodine ER in all

patients (0.60 vs 0.55;

p

= 0.03), and in the treatment-naı¨ve

subcohort (0.59 vs 0.49;

p

= 0.004;

Supplementary Table 3

).

3.1.3.

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analyses around the MAGD yielded findings

similar to the base-case analysis (

Supplementary Table 4

).

3.2.

Mirabegron versus other antimuscarinics

3.2.1.

Unmatched analysis

Persistence was statistically significantly better with

mirabegron than with each of the other antimuscarinics

( Table 4

). The median time to discontinuation was

significantly longer with mirabegron (169 d) than with

other antimuscarinics (range 30–78 d), with the adjusted

HR ranging from 1.24 to 2.26 (

p

<

0.0001 all comparisons;

Fig. 2 B

). Persistence at 12 mo was also significantly

greater with mirabegron (38%) than with other anti-

muscarinics (range 8.3–25%;

p

<

0.0001 for all agents,

except

p =

0.002 for oxybutynin IR). Mirabegron statisti-

cally significantly increased both persistence endpoints

compared to each of the other antimuscarinics in all

predefined subcohorts, with the exception of propiverine

in treatment-experienced patients (

Supplementary

Tables 5–13

). The mean MPR was statistically significant-

ly greater with mirabegron (0.59) than with other

antimuscarinics in all patients (range 0.41–0.53;

p

values

0.01 to

<

0.0001;

Table 4

) and in treatment-naı¨ve patients

(range 0.39–0.51;

p

values 0.02 to

<

0.0001;

Supplemen-

tary Tables 5–13

).

Treatment discontinuation was significantly more likely

in women (

p

= 0.0075), in patients with more comorbidities

(

p

= 0.0006), patients aged

<

65 yr (

p

<

0.0001), treatment-

naive patients (

p

<

0.0001), and patients receiving two or

more other medications

( Table 3

).

[(Fig._2)TD$FIG]

Tolterodine IR (

n

= 1523)

Trospium (

n

= 943)

Solifenacin (

n

= 8191)

Oxybutynin IR (

n

= 5779)

Oxybutynin ER (

n

= 1144)

Mirabegron (

n

= 1203)

Fesoterodine (

n

= 1287)

Darifenacin (

n

= 126)

Flavoxate (

n

= 144)

Propiverine (

n

= 95)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

200 250

100 50

150

300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850

Probability of staying on treatment (%)

Treatment duration (d)

Log-rank test:

p

< 0.0001

1203

19232

No. at risk

Mirabegron

Antimuscarinic

drug group

566

5173

515

4653

706

7093

877

10343

624

5942

486

4271

461

3911

416

3437

328

2769

255

2217

188

1752

127

1321

90

941

90

677

90

407

0

407

0

0

0

20

40

60

80

10

(a)

(b)

0

0

200 250

100 50

150

300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850

1203

1561

No. at risk

Mirabegron

Tolterodine ER

566

434

515

394

706

607

877

889

624

497

486

357

461

325

416

286

328

247

255

187

188

147

127

113

90

85

90

65

90

65

0

65

0

0

Probability of staying on treatment (%)

Treatment duration (d)

Mirabegron (

n

= 1203)

Tolterodine ER (

n

= 1561)

Log-rank test:

p

< 0.0001

56 d

169 d

Fig. 2 – Time to discontinuation for mirabegron versus (A) tolterodine ER and (B) other antimuscarinics. ER = extended release; IR = immediate release.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 3 8 9 – 3 9 9

394