Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  392 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 392 476 Next Page
Page Background

were compared between cohorts using Fisher’s exact test or a

x

2

test,

depending on the sample size.

Patients in the mirabegron cohort were randomly matched (1:1) to

patients in each of the other target drug cohorts based on sex, age (

<

65

or 65 yr), Charlson comorbidity index score

[22,23]

, and treatment

status (naı¨ve or experienced) using a greedy algorithm. All analyses were

repeated in matched populations.

Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary,

NC, USA).

3.

Results

Between May 1, 2013 and June 29, 2014, 69 002 patients

with at least one prescription for a target OAB drug were

identified. A total of 47 006 (68%) patients were excluded

( Fig. 1

), so 21 996 (32%) patients constituted the study

population. Solifenacin was the most commonly prescribed

drug (

n

= 8191, 37%), followed by oxybutynin IR (

n

= 5779,

26%). Other target drugs each accounted for less than 10% of

the study population, including mirabegron (5.5%). All

patients were followed for 12 mo.

Patient demographics and characteristics at baseline are

presented in

Table 1 .

Compared to tolterodine ER, a

significantly higher proportion of patients prescribed

mirabegron were female (76% vs 64%), treatment-experi-

enced (60% vs 26%), and receiving more than eight

coexisting medications at the index date (25% vs 19%).

3.1.

Mirabegron versus tolterodine ER

3.1.1.

Unmatched analysis

Persistence was statistically significantly greater with

mirabegron than with tolterodine ER

( Table 2

). The median

time to discontinuation with mirabegron was 169 d (inter-

quartile range [IQR] 41–not reached) compared to 56 d (IQR,

28–254) with tolterodine ER (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.41–

1.71;

p

<

0.0001;

Fig. 2

A). Persistence at 12 mo was also

significantly greater for mirabegron (38%) than for tolter-

odine ER (20%; adjusted OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40–0.58;

p

<

0.0001). Both persistence endpoints were significantly

greater with mirabegron than with tolterodine ER in all

predefined subcohorts (treatment-naı¨ve, treatment-experi-

enced, and 65 yr;

p

<

0.0001 for all comparisons;

Table 2

).

Mean MPR was significantly greater with mirabegron than

with tolterodine ER in all patients, and in the treatment-

naı¨ve and 65-yr-old subcohorts (

p

<

0.0001 all compar-

isons;

Table 2

).

Treatment discontinuation was significantly more likely

in treatment-naı¨ve patients (

p

<

0.0001), whereas age, sex,

comorbidities, hypertension, and coexistent medications

did not affect persistence

( Table 3

).

3.1.2.

Matched analysis

Matched patient baseline characteristics are presented in

Supplementary Table 2

. Time to discontinuation and 12-mo

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Fig. 1 – Patient selection flowchart. 5-ARI = 5

a

reductase inhibitor; ER = extended release; IR = immediate release; OAB = overactive bladder. *Patients

may have had more than one reason for exclusion.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 3 8 9 – 3 9 9

392