Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  397 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 397 476 Next Page
Page Background

Improvements with mirabegron were maintained in pre-

defined subcohorts of treatment-naı¨ve, treatment-experi-

enced, and older patients, as well as after matching to

controls for potentially confounding differences in baseline

characteristics. The findings of a sensitivity analysis that

tested assumptions around the date of discontinuation

were similar to those of the base-case analysis. Adherence,

assessed in terms of MPR with a fixed denominator, was

significantly greater with mirabegron than with all anti-

muscarinics in the overall study population, although these

benefits appeared to be limited mainly to treatment-naı¨ve

patients in both matched and unmatched analyses. Overall,

our findings suggest that persistence and adherence with

mirabegron are statistically superior to those with other

antimuscarinics in a large UK primary care population. The

clinical significance of increased adherence has been

highlighted recently in a prospective study showing that

women who adhered to OAB medication had significantly

greater improvements in urinary symptoms than non-

adherent women did

[24]

.

Our observations are consistent with other recent real-

world studies comparing mirabegron to antimuscarinic

agents under different health care systems in the US, Japan,

and Canada, which reported significantly better persistence

with mirabegron

[15–17]

. In the North American studies,

both of which were based on retrospective claims data, the

relative risk of discontinuation with mirabegron versus

tolterodine ER was similar to the present study (HR: Canada,

1.44; USA, 1.64; UK, 1.56)

[15,16]

. Persistence with

mirabegron versus tolterodine was also greater in treat-

ment-naive and treatment-experienced cohorts in both

studies

[15,16]

, as in the present study. The smaller

Japanese study, based on medical records, reported a

significantly improved 12-mo persistence rate with mir-

abegron compared to tolterodine (38% vs 20%)

[17]

, as in the

present study (38% vs 20%). In addition, two noncompara-

tive studies of persistence with mirabegron in UK popula-

tions have recently been reported

[25,26]

, but cannot be

directly compared with our study because of a shorter

duration of follow-up in one study (6 mo)

[25]

and many

patients (37%) received mirabegron in combination with

antimuscarinics in the other

[26]

.

In our study, discontinuation of antimuscarinics was less

common among men than among women and generally

occurred within 1–3 mo, compared to a median of 5.6 mo

with mirabegron. We were unable to examine the reasons

for discontinuation in our study as these data are not

contained within the CPRD database. However, data from a

large US survey (

>

5000 respondents) suggested that the

most common reasons for discontinuation of antimuscari-

nics were treatment not working as expected, switching to a

new medication, coping without medication, and side

effects

[27]

. Other reasons described in the literature

included inadequate patient counselling resulting in

unrealistic patient expectations

[28]

, cost

[27,29,30]

,

unwillingness to take long-term treatment

[27] ,

and

proactive treatment holidays, all of which may have

occurred in our study. It is conceivable that the initial

separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves

( Fig. 2

) is attributable

to differences between mirabegron and antimuscarinics in

the occurrence of bothersome anticholinergic side effects,

notably dry mouth,

[9,10]

. The time to onset of adverse

events with antimuscarinics is approximately 1 wk

[31]

and

fits with this early difference between groups. The gradient

of the curves was generally comparable after 3 mo,

suggesting that reasons for later discontinuations may

have been common to both drug classes. Further efforts are

needed to better understand the reasons for discontinua-

tion of OAB medications and how to support patients so that

they achieve long-term compliance.

This study has many design strengths including a large

population from the CPRD database that is broadly

representative of the UK general population

[21]

and the

use of matching to control for baseline imbalances, notably

the proportion of treatment-experienced patients, which

was greater in the mirabegron cohort at baseline. The

unmatched analysis was used as the primary analysis

because, after applying the stringent inclusion/exclusion

criteria, it was uncertain if there would be adequate patient

numbers for matching. The main study limitations are its

retrospective design and the use of prescription-event rather

than patient-derived data (eg, patient diaries) to estimate

outcomes. Although patients with

<

12-mo follow-up after

treatment initiation were excluded (

n

= 6078;

Fig. 1

) to

support the assessment of all study objectives and end-

points, these patients could have theoretically been included

in the analysis of time to discontinuation. The inability to

capture reasons for discontinuation of treatment, as well as

any potential health benefits resulting from increased

persistence in terms of symptom severity and health-related

quality of life (HRQoL), were other limitations of this study. It

should also be noted that there was variation in the

prescribing of mirabegron relative to tolterodine ER in the

early months of the study selection period (

Supplementary

Fig. 2

), possibly because of the UK launch of mirabegron

(February 2013) and the release of updated treatment

guidelines to include mirabegron

[32] .

The relatively later

availability of mirabegron and its positioning within UK

guidelines

[32]

may also have contributed to the higher

proportion of treatment-experienced patients in this group.

Analyses of health care resource use and associated costs

from the present study will be reported separately. Large

prospective observational studies of mirabegron are ongo-

ing in the USA (PERSPECTIVE;

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/ show/NCT02386072

) and Europe (BELIEVE;

https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02320773

), which include

persistence and HRQoL outcomes in a real-life setting. These

studies may help to better understand the benefits of

improved treatment persistence, reasons for discontinua-

tion, and why men in our study were less likely to

discontinue treatment than women.

5.

Conclusions

Patients receiving mirabegron remain on treatment for

significantly longer and have significantly better 12-mo

persistence and adherence rates compared to tolterodine ER

and other antimuscarinics commonly prescribed for OAB in

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 3 8 9 – 3 9 9

397