Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  390 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 390 476 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a complex of lower urinary tract

storage symptoms characterised by urgency, with or

without urgency incontinence, and often accompanied by

frequency and nocturia in the absence of proven infection or

other pathology

[1]

. The condition is common, affecting an

estimated 12% of adults

[2] .

In the UK, pharmacotherapy is used to manage OAB

symptoms if lifestyle, behavioural, and conservativemeasures

fail

[3,4]

. Antimuscarinics are the mainstay of pharmacother-

apy for OAB. However, systemic blockade of muscarinic

receptors leads to common, bothersome class-related adverse

events such as dry mouth, constipation, and headache

[5] .

Mirabegron, a selective

b

3

-adrenoceptor agonist, is an

alternative treatment option with established efficacy in

patients with OAB

[6–8] .

Overall rates of treatment-emergent

adverse events for mirabegron are similar to those observed

for antimuscarinics

[9] ,

but the risk of dry mouth and

constipation is significantly lower for mirabegron

[10]

.

Persistence (time from initiation to discontinuation of

therapy

[11]

) and adherence (extent to which a patient acts

in accordance with the prescribed interval and dose of a

dosing regimen

[11]

) with oral antimuscarinics are recog-

nised as among the lowest for medications used for

common chronic conditions

[12]

and fall rapidly after

treatment initiation

[13] .

Depending on the antimuscarinic

prescribed, 65–86% of patients discontinue therapy after

1 yr

[14]

. Real-world data, mainly from retrospective

medical claims databases, suggest that treatment persis-

tence with mirabegron may be greater than for antimus-

carinics in OAB

[15–17] .

The objective of this study was to compare treatment

persistence and adherence for mirabegron compared to

tolterodine extended-release (ER) over a 12-mo period,

consistent with a previous long-term comparative study

[18]

, and with other antimuscarinics in UK clinical practice.

Our study was based on prescription records from a large

primary and secondary care database in the UK, Clinical

Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). One other UK-specific

comparative study of persistence for mirabegron versus

antimuscarinics is ongoing, but has only been presented in

preliminary form to date

[19,20]

. As well as evaluating

persistence in the total study population, we also looked at

specific predefined subgroups of interest (ie, treatment-

naı¨ve, treatment experienced and elderly patients) and

applied matching to control for key baseline characteristics.

2.

Patients and methods

2.1.

Study design and data source

This was a retrospective, longitudinal, observational, cohort study of

patients who received a prescription for a target OAB medication in UK

clinical practice. The primary objective was to compare persistence on

treatment betweenmirabegron and tolterodine ER. Secondary objectives

included comparing persistence and adherence between mirabegron

and other antimuscarinics, and to describe patient characteristics that

affected persistence and adherence.

Anonymised data were taken from the CPRD GOLD, a large, nationally

representative, primary care research database that collates medical

records from 674 general practices across the UK. It includes data for

approximately 4.4 million active patients (ie, alive, currently registered)

who meet database quality criteria

[21]

.

Approval for the study protocol was obtained from the CPRD

Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (protocol 16_097R; approv-

al date July 6, 2016). The study was conducted in compliance with

national and European Union requirements ensuring the rights of

participants in noninterventional studies.

2.2.

Study population

Adults aged 18 yr with at least one prescription for a target drug issued

between May 1, 2013 and June 29, 2014 (selection period) were eligible

(

Supplementary Fig. 1

). The selection period was based on the

availability of mirabegron (approved in Europe in January 2013) and

to allow at least 12-mo patient follow-up before analysis of the database.

The target drugs were mirabegron, darifenacin, fesoterodine, flavoxate,

oxybutynin ER or immediate-release (IR), propiverine, solifenacin,

tolterodine ER or IR, and trospium chloride. The first prescription date

for a target drug initiated during the selection period was defined as the

index date, and the drug was designated the index drug. Only patients

with a new prescription were included; patients with a prescription for

the index drug in the 12 mo before the index date were excluded.

Patients were required to have at least 12 mo of continuous enrolment in

CPRD before (pre-index period) and after (post-index period) the index

date. Prescriptions for combination therapy with two target drugs at the

index date or a 5

a

-reductase inhibitor (suggestive of benign prostatic

hyperplasia due to an enlarged prostate) during follow-up were not

permitted.

2.3.

Endpoints

Persistence on treatment was assessed using two endpoints: median

time to discontinuation (primary endpoint) and the persistence rate at

12 mo. Adherence was also assessed using two endpoints: medication

possession ratio (MPR) at 12mo and adherence rate at 12mo. Definitions

of the endpoints are provided in

Supplementary Table 1

.

2.4.

Statistical analysis

Analyses included all patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Analyses

were also stratified according to the following prespecified subcohorts at

index date: treatment-naı¨ve (no prescription for any target drug during

the pre-index period); treatment-experienced (prescription for at least

one non-index target drug during the pre-index period); and elderly

patients ( 65 yr).

Time to discontinuation was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival

analysis, and differences between cohorts were assessed via log-rank

test; hazard ratios (HRs) are reported for comparisons between

mirabegron (reference) and antimuscarinics. Patients were censored if

they reached the end of follow-up without discontinuation. Cox

proportional-hazards regression models, adjusted for potential con-

founding factors (gender, age, Charlson index, treatment status,

hypertension, polypharmacy), were used to compare cohorts (expressed

as HR and 95% confidence interval [CI]). For the primary analysis, OAB

treatment was defined as discontinued if the maximum allowable gap

duration (MAGD) was at least 1.5 times the intended duration of the

most recent prescription. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a

MAGD ratio of 2 and fixed definitions of 30, 45, 60, and 90 d. Logistic

regression models, adjusted for potential confounding factors, were used

to compare 12-mo persistence rates between cohorts (expressed as odds

ratio [OR] and 95% CI). Proportions of persistent and adherent patients

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 3 8 9 – 3 9 9

390