Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  413 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 413 476 Next Page
Page Background

objective response rate (ORR) according to Response

Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

[22] .

Secondary

outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and efficacy analyses

according to PD-L1 expression status in tumor tissue.

2.3.

Data extraction

Two independent reviewers (M.R. and A.A.M.V.) assessed

relevant articles for study eligibility, and any disagreement

on inclusion was resolved by discussion. Using a standard-

ized data extraction form, the following details were

extracted: study design, number of patients, patient

characteristics, treatment intervention, median duration

of follow-up, survival data, ORR, AEs, and PD-L1 expression

status. Data were extracted from all included studies by one

reviewer (M.R.) and subsequently checked by a second

reviewer (A.A.M.V.) to ensure their accuracy.

2.4.

Data analysis

Descriptive analyses were used to present the data.

Continuous outcomes were described using mean and

standard deviation, or alternatively, median and (inter-

quartile) range. For categorical outcomes, frequencies and

proportions were used. If reported, hazard ratios (HRs) with

confidence intervals (CIs) were mentioned. Owing to the

limited number of available studies, no quantitative

analysis (ie, meta-analysis) could be performed.

3.

Evidence synthesis

3.1.

Study selection

The initial literature search identified 3354 articles. After

removing duplicate studies, one reviewer (M.R.) evaluated

all titles and abstracts. Finally, 40 publications were

identified as potentially relevant and were retrieved for

full-text evaluation. According to the inclusion criteria, six

randomized phase 1–3 clinical trials were selected for

evidence synthesis (one trial on UCC, three trials on RCC, and

two trials on PC;

Table 1 )

. The literature search identified

16 additional non-RCTs addressing the safety and efficacy of

ICIs in urological cancer (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).

3.2.

Characteristics, efficacy, and PD-L1 status in selected

studies

The characteristics, efficacy measures, and PD-L1 status of

the included studies are presented in

Tables 1, 2, and 3

,

respectively (see also Supplementary Table 3).

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Fig. 1 – T-cell coinhibitory receptor expression and checkpoint inhibition. Tumor cells and antigen presenting cells (APCs) express a specific antigen

that is presented to cytotoxic T cells in a peptide major histocompatibility complex (MHC). T cells recognize this presented antigen with their T-cell

receptor (TCR) and, together with binding of costimulatory receptors (eg, CD28); this leads to T-cell activation and subsequently elimination of the

(tumor) cell. Interaction of coinhibitory receptors on T cells with their ligands on APCs or tumor cells inhibits T-cell activation. Known coinhibitory

receptors are PD-1 (that interacts with its ligand PD-L1) and CTLA-4. Blocking antibodies against these coinhibitory receptors or their ligands can

prevent their interaction and the subsequent inhibition of T-cell activity. CTLA-4 = cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4; PD-1 = programmed

cell death 1; PD-L1 = programmed cell death receptor ligand 1.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 4 1 1 – 4 2 3

413