Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  416 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 416 476 Next Page
Page Background

Table 2 – Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in randomized clinical trials in urological cancer

Treatment

Patients

(

n

)

Median

follow-up (mo)

(CI)

Median

OS (mo)

(CI)

Median

PFS (mo)

(CI)

ORR

(CI)

CR

PR

SD PD NE Median duration

of response (mo)

(CI)

Other

Urothelial cell cancer

Bellmunt et al (2017)

[23]

Pembrolizumab 200 mg

270 14.1

(9.9–22.1)

a

10.3

(8.0–11.8)

b

2.1

(2.0–2.2)

b

21.1%

(16.4–26.5)

b

19

(7%)

38

(14.1%)

47

(17.4%)

131

(48.5%)

35

(13.0%)

NR

(1.6+ to 15.6+)

a

Chemotherapy

272 14.1

(9.9–22.1)

a

7.4

(6.1–8.3)

b

3.3

(2.3–3.5)

b

11.4%

(7.9–15.8)

b

9

(3.3%)

22

(8.1%)

91

(33.5%)

90

(33.1%)

60

(22.1%)

4.3

(1.4+ to 15.4+)

a

Renal cell cancer

Motzer et al (2015)

[26]

Nivolumab 3 mg/kg

410 NA

25.0

(21.8–NR)

b

4.6

(3.7–5.4)

b

25%

4

(1%)

99

(24%)

141

(34%)

143

(35%)

23

(6%)

12.0

(0–27.6)

a

Everolimus 10 mg

411 NA

19.6

(17.6–23.1)

b

4.4

(3.7–5.5)

b

5%

2

(1%)

20 (5%) 227

(55%)

114

(28%)

48

(12%)

12.0

(0–22.2)

a

Motzer et al (2015)

[25]

Nivolumab 0.3 mg/kg

60 NA

18.2

(16.2–24.0)

c

2.7

(1.9–3.0)

c

20%

(13.4–28.2)

c

1

(2%)

11

(18%)

22

(37%)

24

(40%)

2

(3%)

NR

(NR–NR)

c

Nivolumab 2 mg/kg

54 NA

25.5

(19.8–28.8)

c

4.0

(2.8–4.2)

c

22%

(15.0–31.1)

c

1

(2%)

11

(20%)

23

(43%)

18

(33%)

1

(2%)

NR

(4.2–NR)

c

Nivolumab 10 mg/kg

54 NA

24.7

(15.3–26.0)

c

4.2

(2.8–5.5)

c

20%

(13.4–29.1)

c

0

(0%)

11

(20%)

24

(44%)

17

(32%)

2

(4%)

22.3

(4.8–NR)

c

Choueiri et al (2016)

[24]

All patients

91 NA

NA

NA

15%

(8.7–24.5)

b

2

(2%)

12

(13%)

42

(46%)

27

(30%)

8

(9%)

NA

Previously treated group Nivolumab 0.3 mg/kg

22 NA

16.4

(10.1–NR)

b

NA

9%

(1.1–29.2)

b

0

(0%)

2

(9%)

8

(36%)

9

(41%)

3

(14%)

NA

Nivolumab 2 mg/kg

22 NA

NR

NA

18%

(5.2–40.3)

b

0

(0%)

4

(18%)

10

(46%)

5

(23%)

3

(14%)

NA

Nivolumab 10 mg/kg

23 NA

25.2

(12.0–NR)

b

NA

22%

(7.5–43.7)

b

0

(0%)

5

(22%)

11 (48%) 6

(26%)

1

(4%)

NA

Treatment-naive group

Nivolumab 10 mg/kg

24 NA

NR

NA

13%

(2.7–32.4)

b

2

(8%)

1

(4%)

13

(54%)

7

(29%)

1

(4%)

NA

PSARR (CI)

b

Prostate cancer

Beer et al (2017)

[27]

Ipilimumab

400

24–48

28.7

(24.5–32.5)

b

5.6

(5.3–6.3)

b

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 23%

(19–27)

b

Placebo

202

24–48

29.7

(26.1–34.2)

b

3.8

(2.8–4.1)

b

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8%

(5–13)

b

Kwon et al (2014)

[28]

Radiotherapy with ipilimumab

399

9.9

(4.3–16.7)

d

11.2

(9.5–12.7)

b

4.0

(3.6–4.3)

b

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 13.1%

(9.5–17.5)

b

Radiotherapy with placebo

400

9.3

(5.4–14.6)

d

10.0

(8.3–11.0)

b

3.1

(2.9–3.4)

b

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2%

(3.0–8.4)

b

CI = confidence interval; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; ORR = objective response rate; CR = complete response; PR = partial response; SD = stable disease; PD = progressive disease; NE = not

evaluable; PSARR = prostate-specific antigen response rate; NA = not available; NR = not reached.

a

Range.

b

CI 95%.

c

CI 80%.

d

Interquartile range.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 4 1 1 – 4 2 3

416