Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  367 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 367 476 Next Page
Page Background

classification, which is characterized by a stromal signature

and immune infiltration, was not found to harbor a

characteristic pattern of genomic alterations. The five Lund

subtypes, however, were characterized by specific (and

anticipated

[9]

) mutations and copy number variations. The

more definitive molecular correlation could be interpreted

as an indication that the Lund classification better reflects

true bladder cancer biology. Indeed, this raises the question

of whether genomic alterations could be used to derive a

consensus classification. In the original description, Choi

et al

[2]

showed that the p53-like subtype has potential

clinical relevance in the context of response to chemother-

apy, also implying important biologic relevance. The

authors suggest that the lack of genomic correlation

indicates that nongenomic factors drive the differentiation

of this subtype from basal and luminal tumors.

Molecular subtyping and genomic sequencing have both

been used independently to address the question of

sensitivity to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the neoad-

juvant setting. While Choi et al

[2]

determined that p53-like

tumors were less likely to respond to chemotherapy, we

were unable to validate this finding

[5_TD$DIFF]

in a larger metadata set

[10]

. We observed that patients with basal tumors

experienced the greatest benefit from neoadjuvant chemo-

therapy. Other groups have focused on mutations in single

genes or gene panels. While all of these markers need

further validation before being suitable for clinical imple-

mentation, it is also essential to investigate RNA subtyping

and genomic alterations in the same patients in combina-

tion to determine if this can further augment prediction of

response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For example,

survival is poor in patients with claudin-low tumors

receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but some patients

do respond, and it will be important to test whether these

responding patients have specific genomic alterations such

as a mutation in a DNA damage repair gene.

There is no question that RNA-based subtyping has

helped in deconvoluting some of the heterogeneity of

bladder cancer. The differential response to chemotherapy

within one molecular subtype, however, underlines that

there is still molecular, pathologic, and, most importantly,

clinical heterogeneity between tumors in a given subtype.

The integrative analysis of both the transcriptome and the

genome should provide additional insight into this hetero-

geneity.

The analysis by Choi

[5]

et al advances our understanding

of the bladder cancer subtypes. An updated report from the

TCGA consortium of the entire TCGA patient cohort is

expected in the near future, and is likely to provide

additional insights. Further advances in the field will

include a more formal integrative analysis using computa-

tional tools to predict on the basis of RNA expression which

genomic alterations are driver alterations and which

pathways are therefore worth targeting therapeutically.

In the future, analyses will also have to include the

proteome, which adds an additional layer of complexity

but should reveal further important insights into bladder

cancer biology.

Conflicts of interest:

The author has been an advisory board member for

AbbVie, Allergan, Astellas, Bayer, Biocancell, Biosyent, Ferring, Janssen,

Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Sitka, and Spectrum; has been a speaker for

AbbVie, Biosyent, Ferring, and Janssen; has received honoraria from

Janssen, Bayer, and Sanofi; has received grant funding from New B

Innovation, iProgen, and GenomeDx; and has been involved in clinical

trials with Astellas, Ferring, Janssen, and Roche.

References

[1]

Sjodahl G, Lauss M, Lovgren K, et al. A molecular taxonomy for urothelial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:3377–86

.

[2]

Choi W, Czerniak B, Ochoa A, et al. Intrinsic basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2014;11:400–10

.

[3]

Damrauer JS, Hoadley KA, Chism DD, et al. Intrinsic subtypes of high-grade bladder cancer reflect the hallmarks of breast cancer biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:3110–5.

[4]

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature 2014;507: 315–22

.

[5]

Choi W, Ochoa A, McConkey DJ, et al. Genetic alterations in the molecular subtypes of bladder cancer: illustration in The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Eur Urol 2017;72:354–65

.

[6]

Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A, et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18: 312–22

.

[7]

Rosenberg JE, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T, et al. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2016;387:1909–20.

[8]

Kardos J, Chai S, Mose LE, et al. Claudin-low bladder tumors are immune infiltrated and actively immune suppressed. JCI Insight 2016;1:e85902.

[9]

Aine M, Eriksson P, Liedberg F, Sjodahl G, Hoglund M. Biological determinants of bladder cancer gene expression subtypes. Sci Rep 2015;5:10957

.

[10] Seiler R, Al Deen Ashab H, Erho N, et al. Impact of molecular

subtypes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer on predicting re-

sponse and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Urol.

In press.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.030 .

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 3 6 6 – 3 6 7

367