Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  353 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 353 476 Next Page
Page Background [7]

in advanced PC that may further confound attribution of

survival advantage to variation in the initial treatment

strategy.

Epidemiologic data in this arena, while thought-provok-

ing and hypothesis-generating, can still be misleading

despite high-fidelity data capture and sophisticated statisti-

cal analysis

[8] .

Thus, examining the present data, we are

cautiously optimistic that continued development and

implementation of high-quality clinical trials with agree-

ment on both well-defined enrollment criteria and stan-

dardized outcome measures will allow us to identify biologic

subsets who may benefit most from local therapy. This will

allow clinicians to apply local therapy in cases for which an

absolute treatment benefit is known, while sparing many

men the morbidity of addition of local therapy to standard

systemic approaches when it is of no benefit.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

[1] Culp SH, Schellhammer PF, Williams MB. Might men diagnosed

withmetastatic prostate cancer benefit fromdefinitive treatment of

the primary tumor?. A SEER-based study. Eur Urol 2014;65:1058–

66

. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012

.

[2] Gratzke C, Engel J, Stief CG. Role of radical prostatectomy in

metastatic prostate cancer: data from the Munich cancer registry.

Eur Urol 2014;66:602–3.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014. 04.009

.

[3] Rusthoven CG, Jones BL, Flaig TW, et al. Improved survival with

prostate radiation in addition to androgen deprivation therapy for

men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol

2016;34:2835–42.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4788 .

[4] O’Shaughnessy MJ, McBride SM, Vargas HA, et al. A pilot study of a

multimodal treatment paradigm to accelerate drug evaluations in

early-stage metastatic prostate cancer. Urology 2017;102:164–72.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.044

.

[5] Sooriakumaran P, Nyberg T, Akre O, et al. Survival among men at

high risk of disseminated prostate cancer receiving initial locally

directed radical treatment or initial androgen deprivation therapy.

Eur Urol 2017;72:345–51.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo. 2017.04.002

.

[6] Crawford ED, Petrylak DP, Shore N, et al. The role of therapeutic

layering in optimizing treatment for patients with castration-resis-

tant prostate cancer (RADAR II). Urology. In press.

http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.033

.

[7] Barbieri CE, Chinnaiyan AM, Lerner SP, Swanton C, Rubin MA. The

emergence of precision urologic oncology: a collaborative review

on biomarker-driven therapeutics. Eur Urol 2017;71:237–46.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.024

.

[8] Williams SB, Huo J, Chamie K, et al. Discerning the survival

advantage among patients with prostate cancer who undergo

radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: the limitations of cancer

registry data: survival advantage with prostatectomy. Cancer

2017;123:1617–24.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30506

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 3 5 2 – 3 5 3

353