Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  458 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 458 476 Next Page
Page Background

The findings in this study provide an important

pathophysiologic context to previous reports that active

surveillance for GS6 prostate cancer is highly effective and

safe. For example, in a cohort of 1300 men at the Johns

Hopkins Hospital, men with low-risk prostate cancer had

excellent outcomes on active surveillance, with 15-yr

metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival rates of 99.4%

and 99.9%, respectively

[21]

. Other observational cohort

series with variable inclusion criteria and follow-up

duration have generally shown similar long-term outcomes

[22,23]

. These findings are logically supported by the rarity

of adverse pathology for true GS6 in our study. The

favorable outcomes on active surveillance have led to

increasing rates of this management strategy for men with

low-risk prostate cancer, with recent studies showing

favorable outcome rates of 50%

[6,7]

. Following maximal

characterization of the prostate cancer, routine treatments

of low-risk cancers with surgery or radiation are unlikely to

have a meaningful impact on long-term cancer-specific

survival, while exposing the patient to potential side effects

including sexual, urinary, and bowel dysfunction

[8]

. Fur-

ther prospective studies of techniques to more accurately

image and diagnose prostate cancer on biopsy will provide

valuable information for patients and clinicians in finalizing

a management decision.

Limitations of our study include its retrospective design

and other potential biases. The RP cases fromeach institution

were reviewed separately, without assessing interobserver

agreement. Although the majority (60%) of GS6 cases did not

include a pelvic lymph-node dissection, and some lymph-

node metastases could theoretically have been missed, data

fromRoss et al in over 14 000 RPs suggest that this is unlikely

[1] .

Our cohort included partial embedding of RP specimens,

and this may have led to incomplete data. Reasons for partial

embedding at both institutions were cost and burden to

pathology staff, similar to those reported by Vainer et al who

observed a decrease in workload of 30% for partial compared

to complete embedding, and who noted that only two of

238 prostatectomies (0.8%) were upstaged to pT3a because of

focal EPE that was only identified in the withheld part of the

specimens not originally examined

[24] .

In another study,

Kim et al compared partial and complete embedding in

136 prostatectomy specimens, and there was perfect

agreement in detection rates for EPE using their reported

technique for partial embedding

[25]

. The non-embedded

portions of the prostatectomy specimens in this study were

not available for retrieval and analysis because they had been

previously discarded as per institutional policy (retention for

6 months after the initial pathologic analysis). Fifteen (20%)

patients with GS6 pT3 and 21 (14%) with GS 7 pT3b had no

available pathology specimens, similar to the 14% rate of

unavailable specimens in the study by Ross et al

[1] .

These

missing specimens and the non-embedded portions of

prostate tissue could have contained GS6 with EPE or SVI,

thus introducing a possible selection bias that could limit

external validity. The pathologists in this study were blinded

to patient information and previous pathology reports,

although they were aware of the purpose of the study as

well as the grade and stage of the cases being re-reviewed,

and this could have introduced bias. However, the large

sample size and multi-institutional nature of this study are

strengths. Further studies from other cohorts will evaluate

the incidence of ECE or SVI for GS6 prostate cancer, and this

will carry implications regarding the malignant potential of

true GS6. Hernandez et al previously reported no distant

metastases or mortalities attributed to prostate cancer in

over 2500 patients with GS6 pT2 disease, with a 1.3%

actuarial probability for 15-yr biochemical recurrence

[26] .

With median follow-up of 20 mo, there were no cases

of biochemical recurrence for the seven patients with pT3a

and true GS6 in this study. In particular, genomics, molecular

profiles, and longer-term outcomes of biochemical recur-

rence, distant metastases, and prostate cancer-specific

mortality in patients with GS6 pT3a disease will be of

interest for future studies.

Both institutions in this study have had dedicated

genitourinary pathologists: University of Chicago since

2006, and Northwestern University since 2000. The changes

in grading and staging of specimens in this study on re-

review emphasize the challenge of pathologic assignment,

even at large academic centers with expert pathologists.

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Fig. 1 – (A) Gleason score 6 (GS6) disease with focal extraprostatic

extension (EPE; arrow and B). (B) Neoplastic well-formed glands are

seen at the level of the adipocytes.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 4 5 5 – 4 6 0

458