Letter to the Editor
Re: James J
[1_TD$DIFF]
. Hsieh, David Chen, Patricia
[6_TD$DIFF]
I. Wang,
[7_TD$DIFF]
et
[8_TD$DIFF]
al.
Genomic Biomarkers of a Randomized Trial Comparing
First-line Everolimus and Sunitinib in Patients with
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2017;71:
405–14
A recent publicationwith a total of 220metastatic clear cell
renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients from RECORD-3, a
randomized phase 2 trial, showed that mutation events
were enriched in metastatic ccRCC patients and
PBRM1
,
BAP1
, and
KDM5C
mutation status impacted outcomes of
targeted therapies. This deep sequencing assay would be
very exciting and clinically meaningful to know the gene
mutation affect response efficacy of vascular endothelial
growth factor and
[9_TD$DIFF]
mammalian target of rapamycin
inhibitors in metastatic ccRCC which could be potential
biomarkers in targeted therapy selection and medication
sequence for patients with metastatic ccRCC. However,
although the findings of this advanced technique seemed to
be promising and encouraging, we hold some questions for
the scientific rigor and practicality of this study, hoping to
offer more useful references for this theory’s clinical
practice.
Firstly, we noticed the authors
[1]conducted the deep
sequencing at the beginning of the targeted treatment
and drew the conclusions that with everolimus/sunitinib,
PBRM1
and
BAP1
mutations contributed to a longer and
shorter median first-line progression free survival,
relatively, and with sunitinib/everolimus, the
KDM5C
mutation resulted in a longer median first-line progres-
sion free survival. However, it seemed to ignore the
dynamic process of the interaction between tumor status
and targeted treatment. Because the tumor adaptability
and microenvironment change, quantities of acquired
mutations are produced during the targeted therapy and
it is the root cause of almost all patients’ acquisition of
resistance who are initially sensitive to targeted therapy
[2]. This indicates the mutation status before crossover
is not the same as the initial first-line treatment.
For second-line treatment, besides vascular endothelial
growth factor and
[9_TD$DIFF]
mammalian target of rapamycin
inhibitor, cabozatinibas, a new multitarget inhibitor,
has been confirmed that it could significantly
increase overall survival and also decrease disease
progression risks
[3]. In the meantime, it is well known
that specific targeted therapy has a different clinical
efficacy to different mutations. Hence, faced with a
variety of second-line drugs, we have good reasons to
believe patients may obtain the maximum survival
benefits when urologists dynamically monitor mutation
changes and select the most appropriate second-line
therapy.
Furthermore, the great heterogeneity of RCC should be
noted and genotypic variation exists not only among
individuals, but also intratumor, even the individual
tumors and their metastasis
[4]. Thereby, it is very likely
that the efficacy of the same targeted drug is different
from primary and metastatic lesions. In addition, smok-
ing, as the most important risk factor of RCC tumorigen-
esis, is deemed to affect the clinical effects of sunitinib, as
well as increase the somatic mutation load
[5,6] ;therefore, it is not correct to infer smoking may be a
confounding factor in gene mutations predicting out-
comes of targeted therapy. Hence, we wonder how many
smoking patients are enrolled in this study and whether
there would have been the same results when taking
smoking as a stratified factor.
In conclusion, we strongly recommend to monitor gene
mutations in real-time sequencing during targeted thera-
pies, together with other clinical data, simultaneously
using multi-disciplinary mode to ultimately provide a
comprehensive precision medicine evidence of the indi-
vidual targeted treatment for advanced metastatic ccRCC
patients.
Conflicts of interest:
[4_TD$DIFF]
The authors have nothing to disclose.
References
[1]
Hsieh JJ, Chen D, Wang PI, et al. Genomic biomarkers of a random- ized trial comparing first-line everolimus and sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2017;71:405–14.[2]
Asic´ K. Dominant mechanisms of primary resistance differ from dominant mechanisms of secondary resistance to targeted thera- pies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016;97:178–96. E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) e 7 2 – e 7 3available at
www.scienced irect.comjournal homepage:
www.europeanurology.comDOI of original article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.0120302-2838/
#
2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.




