Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  E66 476 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page E66 476 Next Page
Page Background

Letter to the Editor

Re: Declan G. Murphy, Christopher J. Sweeney,

Bertrand Tombal. ‘‘Gotta Catch

[4_TD$DIFF]

’em All’’ or

Do We?

Pokemet

Approach to Metastatic

Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol

[5_TD$DIFF]

2017;72:1–3.

We read with interest the article by Murphy et al

[1]

. Meta-

static disease in prostate cancer, analogous to the spectrum

for

Poke´mon

, comprises awide variety of clinical and genomic

scenarios. The recent evolution of stereotactic body radio-

therapy (SBRT) has provided the ability to ablate metastases

with very few side effects, so the question arises of whether

there is clinical benefit in doing so.

Simultaneously, academic centres around the world

have tested whether SBRT can improve outcomes for

patients. Local control of metastasis is consistently

>

90%

[2,3]

. Ost et al

[2]

published outcomes for a large series of

prostate oligometastases and documented a median distant

progression-free survival (PFS) of 21 mo, with 31% free of

distant progression at 3 yr. Interestingly, Murphy’s own

institutional prospective study reported 2-yr PFS of 32%

[3] .

Overall, current data indicate that after a single or few

outpatient SBRT sessions, delivered with minimal side

effects, a third of patients will be free from disease in the

medium term. SBRT can also defer the need for androgen

deprivation therapy (ADT) by 25 mo

[4]

, improving quality

of life for men with prostate cancer. Randomised trials are

awaited with anticipation (STOMP, NCT01558427; SABR-

COMET, NCT01446744; CORE, NCT02759783; and SARON,

NCT02417662).

Clonal heterogeneity studies have shown that tumour

clones are seeded from metastases to new metastatic sites

[5] .

Just like

Poke´mon

, metastases with the right stimuli will

evolve into more powerful and aggressive entities. For

example, systemic treatment might pressure individual

metastatic clones, giving rise to more heterogeneous,

resistant, and aggressive metastases. Hence, early ablation

of metastastic disease may prevent further metastatic

seeding, delay the time to castration resistance, and result

in long-term freedom from disease. Why then is there an

urgency to commit patients early to life-long systemic

agents associated with well-documented toxicities and

detriment to quality of life?

By contrast, Murphy et al argue that to ‘‘Catch

[4_TD$DIFF]

’em all’’ is

impossible, and that oligometastatic disease should be

treated with early systemic therapy and/or deferred ADT. In

the words of Arthur C. Clarke ‘‘The limits of possible can

only be defined by going beyond them into the impossible’’.

An example is a 59-yr-old patient at the Royal Marsden who

presented in 2011 with rapidly rising prostate-specific

antigen after low-dose rat brachytherapy. Choline positron

emission tomography showed a solitary node in the pelvis.

He received 30 Gy in three fractions without ADT in

2011. Some 6 yr later his PSA is 0.06 ng/ml without any

further intervention.

There are purportedly 802 types of

Poke´mon

with varying

prevalence and attributes. Common

Poke´mon

such as Pidgey

arouse little excitement (analogous to the case presented by

Murphy et al

[1]

). Rarer

Poke´mon

such as Snorlax, analogous

to the true oligometastatic state (such as the patient

described above), are prized and hence chased with fervour.

In advance of forthcoming level one evidence, we would

contend that one should search for, and ablate, oligometa-

static disease in patients with prostate cancer with the same

zeal as our children chase Poke´mon.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments:

Alison C. Tree gratefully acknowledges the support

of the Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research NIHR Biomedical

Research Centre.

References

[1]

Murphy DG, Sweeney CJ,

[8_TD$DIFF]

Tombal B. Gotta catch

[9_TD$DIFF]

’em all’’, or do we? Pokemet approach to metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2017;

[10_TD$DIFF]

72:1–3.

[2]

Ost P, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Van As N, et al. Progression-free survival following stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligo-metastatic pros- tate cancer treatment-naive recurrence: a multi-institutional anal- ysis. Eur Urol 2016;69:9 e12

.

[3]

Siva S, Udovich C, Shaw M, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for bone and nodal oligometastases: Patterns of relapse in a prospective clinical trial. Eur Urol Suppl 2017;16:e1674.

[4]

Decaestecker K, De Meerleer G, Lambert B, et al. Repeated stereo- tactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recur- rence. Radiat Oncol 2014;9:135

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) e 6 6 – e 6 7

available at

www.scienced irect.com

journal homepage:

www.europeanurology.com

DOI of original article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.036

.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.011

0302-2838/

#

2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.